Skip navigation

Daily Archives: May 8th, 2012

May 8, 2012 – 12:15PM

Anthony Hopkins as psychopath Hannibal Lecter in the movie <i> Silence of the Lambs</i>.Anthony Hopkins as psychopath Hannibal Lecter in the movie Silence of the Lambs.

Researchers have found evidence of brain abnormalities in psychopaths convicted of violent offences, including murder, rape and grievous bodily harm.

The British study, carried out by London’s King’s College, used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to measure the volume of grey matter in violent men’s brains.

Psychopaths were found to have structural differences in parts of the brain responsible for understanding emotions compared with other violent offenders and non-offenders.

The study, published online this week in the Archives of General Psychiatry, scanned the brains of 66 men, including 17 psychopaths with antisocial personality disorder (ASPD).

Twenty-seven men who were not psychopaths but had ASPD and 22 healthy non-offenders also had MRI scans.

The psychopaths had less grey matter in the anterior rostral prefrontal cortex and temporal poles of the brain when compared with other violent offenders and the healthy men.

These areas of the brain are important for processing emotions, fear, and social skills.

“These brain regions are thus central to the development of self-conscious emotions, such as guilt or embarrassment, which promote prosocial behaviour and form the basis of moral learning,” lead author Nigel Blackwood said.

He said the reduced volume of grey matter could contribute to the profound social impairments that characterise psychopathy.

Mr Blackwood said that, while the basic empathy processing appeared to be intact in this group, emotional aspects were impaired, with diminished responses to fear and distress in others.

“Men with the syndrome of psychopathy fail to learn from their experience of punishment and to experience self-conscious emotions such as guilt, remorse, or embarrassment, which facilitate desistance from the use of inappropriate behaviours, most significantly aggression and violence,” he said.

Mr Blackwood said the results had important implications for treatment options.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/health/psychopaths-have-structurally-different-brains-20120508-1ya8g.html#ixzz1uGKFCBKX

(and what you can do about it…)

This presentation was given to a session of the BusinessSA conference held May 8, 2012 at the Adelaide Convention Centre.

Hyperlink here

Paul Krugman

May 8, 2012

Opinion

 

Economic recovery through austerity is not working – and the voters know it.

THE French are revolting. The Greeks, too. And it’s about time. Both countries held elections on Sunday that were in effect referendums on the current European economic strategy, and in both countries voters turned two thumbs down. It’s far from clear how soon the votes will lead to changes in actual policy, but time is clearly running out for the strategy of recovery through austerity – and that’s a good thing.

Needless to say, that’s not what you heard from the usual suspects in the run-up to the elections. It was actually kind of funny to see the apostles of orthodoxy trying to portray the cautious, mild-mannered Francois Hollande as a figure of menace. He is ”rather dangerous”, declared The Economist, which observed that he ”genuinely believes in the need to create a fairer society”. Quelle horreur!

What is true is that Hollande’s victory means the end of ”Merkozy”, the Franco-German axis that has enforced the austerity regime of the past two years. This would be a ”dangerous” development if that strategy were working, or even had a reasonable chance of working. But it isn’t and doesn’t; it’s time to move on. Europe’s voters, it turns out, are wiser than the Continent’s best and brightest.

Advertisement: Story continues below

What’s wrong with the prescription of spending cuts as the remedy for Europe’s ills? One answer is that the confidence fairy doesn’t exist – that is, claims that slashing government spending would somehow encourage consumers and businesses to spend more have been overwhelmingly refuted by the experience of the past two years. So spending cuts in a depressed economy just make the depression deeper.

Moreover, there seems to be little if any gain in return for the pain. Consider the case of Ireland, which has been a good soldier in this crisis, imposing ever-harsher austerity in an attempt to win back the favour of the bond markets. According to the prevailing orthodoxy, this should work. In fact, the will to believe is so strong that members of Europe’s policy elite keep proclaiming that Irish austerity has indeed worked, that the Irish economy has begun to recover.

But it hasn’t. And although you’d never know it from much of the press coverage, Irish borrowing costs remain much higher than those of Spain or Italy, let alone Germany. So what are the alternatives? One answer – an answer that makes more sense than almost anyone in Europe is willing to admit – would be to break up the euro, Europe’s common currency. Europe wouldn’t be in this fix if Greece still had its drachma, Spain its peseta, Ireland its punt and so on, because Greece and Spain would have what they now lack: a quick way to restore cost-competitiveness and boost exports, namely devaluation.

As a counterpoint to Ireland’s sad story, consider the case of Iceland, which was ground zero for the financial crisis but was able to respond by devaluing its currency, the krona (and it also had the courage to let its banks fail and default on their debts). Sure enough, Iceland is experiencing the recovery Ireland was supposed to have, but hasn’t.

Yet breaking up the euro would be highly disruptive and would also represent a huge defeat for the ”European project”, the long-run effort to promote peace and democracy through closer integration. Is there another way? Yes, there is – and the Germans have shown how that way can work. Unfortunately, they don’t understand the lessons of their own experience.

Talk to German opinion leaders about the euro crisis, and they like to point out that their own economy was in the doldrums in the early years of the last decade but managed to recover. What they don’t like to acknowledge is that this recovery was driven by the emergence of a huge German trade surplus vis-a-vis other European countries – in particular, vis-a-vis the nations now in crisis – that were booming and experiencing above-normal inflation, thanks to low interest rates.

Europe’s crisis countries might be able to emulate Germany’s success if they faced a comparably favourable environment – that is, if this time it was the rest of Europe, especially Germany, that was experiencing a bit of an inflationary boom. So Germany’s experience isn’t, as the Germans imagine, an argument for unilateral austerity in southern Europe; it’s an argument for much more expansionary policies elsewhere, and in particular for the European Central Bank to drop its obsession with inflation and focus on growth.

The Germans, needless to say, don’t like this conclusion, nor does the leadership of the central bank. They will cling to their fantasies of prosperity through pain and will insist that continuing with their failed strategy is the only responsible thing to do.

But it seems that they will no longer have unquestioning support from the Elysee Palace. And that, believe it or not, means that both the euro and the European project now have a better chance of surviving than they did a few days ago.

Paul Krugman is a columnist with The New York Times and winner of the 2008 Nobel prize for economics.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/europes-revolting-truth-20120507-1y8zh.html#ixzz1uDzQ0M00

 

Rosalind Scutt
Monday, May 7, 2012
Image: Getty
 

While exercise has long been proven to help in the management of depression, a new study reveals that those who exercise more are less likely to suffer from burnout at work.

The study titled ‘Job burnout and depression: Unraveling their temporal relationship and considering the role of physical activity’ was conducted by researchers at Tel Aviv University and was recently published in the Journal of Applied Psychology.

For the study, researchers tracked the personal, occupational, and psychological states of 1,632 healthy Israeli workers in both the private and public sectors for nine years.

The study divided participants into four groups according to the amount of time they invested in weekly exercise — where exercise was defined as any exercise that raises the heart rate and brings on a sweat.

Group one did not exercise, group two did for between 75 and 150 minutes per week, group three exercised for between 150 and 240 minutes per week and group four exercised for 240 minutes or more per week.

The results found a negative correlation between the amount of time an individual works out weekly and the likelihood of them experiencing a deterioration in their mental health, including symptoms of job burnout and depression (in the three years following six years of data collection).

Analysis found that depression and burnout rates were highest in group one (the group that did not participate in any physical activity) while those in group four (the group who exercised most at 240 or more minutes per week), the impact of job burnout and depression was almost non-existent.

The overall conclusion was that employees who consistently work out to improve their physical health also safeguard their mental health.

The results are particularly relevant for busy working mothers who often place the needs of work and family before their own, and provides a reminder that scheduling regular exercise sessions is vital to maintaining optimum physical and psychological health.

For those who cannot commit 240 mins per week to exercise, there’s heartening news. The results also found that the psychological benefits of exercise were obvious after just 150 minutes per week (two and a half hours). That means that just three exercise sessions of around 50 mins per week could help to improve your psychological performance.

 http://aww.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8463312&goback=%2Egde_4154098_member_113457234

 

 

 

 

 
Print Article08 May 2012 7:16am

 Workers from non-English speaking countries are often extremely talented with great work ethics, but many employers mistakenly let language and cultural differences prevent them becoming valued employees, says Performance Education CEO Owen Firth.

Firth, who estimates that within 12 to 18 months, sourcing talent from non-English speaking countries will be a “key imperative” for many employers, says that although an English-as-a-second-language (ESL) graduate’s English might suffice for an entry-level role, as they climb the ladder and expectations rise, their ability to communicate and build relationships becomes critical.

ESL workers don’t just need to be fluent in English, they need to have “business-grade” English, he says.

Too often, though, they have been sent to English language training that is “not designed for business”. For example, all their training exercises talk about going to the supermarket instead of using the context of attending a work meeting or giving a presentation, he says.

Teach business English – and business culture

The onboarding process for ESL workers should also address cultural differences, Firth says.

Providing some form of business culture training is important for those people who are not familiar with the values and norms of the Australian workplace environment. They need to know which behaviours are and are not acceptable – “the rules of engagement”, so to speak.

Firth says it can take as little as two days of seminars and workshops to provide a foreign worker with a foundation for understanding relevant cultural differences, and that this training should be provided early on.

“To put that understanding in place from day one means they know their way around and they’re starting to be aware.

“It will take time for them to adapt, but the sooner they get the knowledge, the sooner they’re going to start to adapt.”

Cultural training helps to prevent workers from doing or saying something inappropriate, creating a bad impression from the start.

However, “traditionally the only cultural training people coming to Australia from different backgrounds ever get is something around kangaroos and barbecues – it’s not specific and it’s not relevant to the business culture,” Firth says.

Instead, new employees need answers to questions such as, “What is expected of me in a meeting?”

“What [foreign workers] often don’t know is that you’re expected to speak up and contribute – in many cultures you wait to be asked to do that,” Firth says.

If a worker doesn’t realise it’s OK to have an opinion – perhaps even one that differs from their supervisor – they could remain silent throughout a meeting.

“The [supervisor's] impression might be, ‘Why have I got this person in my team? They’re too quiet, they’re not contributing, I’ve made a bad decision’.

“In many cases it’s because they’re working off a different set of rules,” he says.

Cultural training is also important because it helps workers to integrate well into their teams.

“It’s all about fitting in with the values of the organisation and the values of the team, so teamwork necessitates relationship building, and relationship building necessitates communication and fit. Without those two things… you’re not going to have good teamwork,” he says.

“This is evident if you walk into many IT teams or finance teams [where] a large proportion of the team [is] from non-English-speaking backgrounds. Without a lot of effort to help everybody integrate, it can work against the objectives of the organisation around fostering good teamwork and common values.”

Play it safe

Employers of ESL workers should be particularly concerned about the nature of safety training they provide, Firth says.

“If organisations are putting people from non-English speaking backgrounds through the same safety training as people from native English speaking backgrounds, there may be some risks to consider.”

An ESL employee might understand and “pass” a safety training course, but still be vulnerable, he warns.

“Safety systems are reliant on your willingness to say, ‘No, I’m not prepared to do that activity on the basis it’s unsafe.’ In some cultures, to say that to a more senior member of staff would be unthinkable, so even if I’ve understood the safety training and I know that doing that particular activity is unsafe and I’m supposed to tell somebody, culturally that may be very, very difficult.

“So understanding and adapting to the culture – [realising] it’s OK to do that, is really important.”

Employers should also consider offering cultural training to ensure their existing managers are equipped to manage multicultural teams.

“This is not about management skills, [it's] about an awareness of other cultures,” he says.

http://www.hrdaily.com.au/nl06_news_selected.php?act=2&nav=1&selkey=2192

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.